Question 1:
During the medieval times the Roman Catholic Church played a dominant role in society, which is why the people believed what they were told by the church. This is a logical fallacy because the church was able to make people believe that the black plague was caused by God’s wrath due to its size and influence on the people of this time. It can be argued that this was not the case at all. Now we can argue that the plague was caused by bacteria spread by fleas with the help of the black rat, which lived close with the lower class people. Poor sanitation also contributed to the disease being spread so vastly.
Another Logical Fallacy is the statement by the Roman Catholic Church that “it was a punishment for the people's sins.” This is incorrect because even monasteries which were filled with religious people such as monks were greatly affected by the plague. Monks are known to be strictly religious people and wouldn’t commit sins. Also even the nobility of the church was affected by the plague to a certain extent. Not greatly because they lived in better living condition than the lower class. Therefore, if people that were not sinners were dying, then people sinning would not be a logical reasoning for why the people were dying.
Question 2:
Had the Roman Catholic Church not been such a dominant entity in medieval European society, this statement would not have been believed by anyone. I believe that the church saying that the plague was a result of god’s wrath to punish the sinners in society was used in order to scare people into doing the right things and following the word of church and god more strictly to be better christians.
Background Reading
In October 1347, Italian ships on the Black Sea en route to and from China dock in Messina, Sicily -- their crews are dead or dying. Whatever is killing them quickly spreads ashore. Within a month, it passes through Sicily and moves back out over water. By January 1348, it has penetrated France via Marseille and North Africa via Tunis, and by July 1348, it spreads through France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Eastern Hungary, and Southern England. This is all the more amazing given that at this time it took a person one to three months to travel from London to Rome. The plague died out in the winters and was resurrected in the springs. At the end of 1349, it had spread throughout the British Isles and Scandinavia and continued to move east.
The death toll was massive -- the "official" figure is one-third of Europe dead between 1348 and 1351, when it temporarily abated, but keep in mind that in some towns the death toll was 90 percent -- in others 10 percent. Further, the poor and anyone else living in close quarters (monks, for instance) died at a higher rate. Many monasteries were completely wiped out, but the death rates among the nobility and the nobility of the church were very low. Understandably, people wanted to know why this was happening to them. Here are the four prominent hypotheses of the day:
The claim of academics and physicians: The plague was the result of a triple conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars on March 20, 1345.
The Roman Catholic Church's claim: God's wrath -- it was a punishment for the people's sins.
The claim of the mayors and town-controlling nobles: Poor sanitation. Dumping waste in the streets leads to sickness (a revolutionary claim at the time -- no one actually knew this to be true).
The claim of the masses (i.e., everyone else): The Jews are poisoning the wells.
Here is the "evidence" used by each group, respectively, to support its claim:
Medicine at the time was based on astrology and astronomy. Most physical sickness was attributed to poor alignment of the stars. The conjunction had happened, and it was a rare celestial event. Other events had been tied to celestial causes. Many were waiting to see what the triple conjunction would cause, and when the Black Plague occurred, they felt that they had found out.
The Church said, "Look around." Plunder, looting, rape, prostitution, war, and drinking were everywhere. God's wrath had shown itself in destructive ways before -- the people of Noah's time were hit with a flood, and the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.
The sanitation workers were among the first to die, and other diseases were suspected to be related to poor sanitation.
Christians tortured "confessions" out of Jews. The Jews were believed to be "jealous" of the Christians (because, it was thought, the Jews knew "in their hearts" that they were damned). The lepers had been blamed for poisoning the wells and causing the typhus outbreak in 1320 (after the Black Plague, it was believed that the Jews set them up to it).
Here are some problems people at the time saw with the evidence:
Nobody but the academics and physicians believed their explanation!
If God's wrath already has descended, there's no reason to change one's behavior. The attitude was roughly, "If we're already doomed, why alter our behavior?"
Later sanitation workers appeared to be immune (unknown to the people, they'd been exposed and had developed a resistance). If it really was poor sanitation, why weren't they still dying? In fact, this immunity among sanitation workers caused many people to think the sanitation workers had magical powers. People followed them on their street-cleaning routes, trying to absorb some of the immunity. Others, more desperate, actually applied waste to themselves, thinking that it would keep the disease away.
So many Jews died too (Why would any community poison itself?). The other problem is that the plague was present in areas where no Jews lived.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with Chris. If the cause of the plague was the punishment for the people’s sins, then it should be only the sinners suffer. However, this plague mainly killed the lower class and monks. And it didn’t affect much among the nobility. I don’t believe that most of nobles are non-sinners. Therefore, people sinning is not the logical explanation of the plague.
ReplyDelete