I chose the claim that the Jews were poisoning the wells because I can see there are some logical fallacies with the statement. Firstly, since Jews were the minority and the Christians were the majority, they discriminated Jews as someone very jealous and unique. That is why the Christians considered that the Jews must be the one who are envious and wanted to kill the Christians. This claim as I can see later is totally false because the plague spread to places where there were no Jews. Then how come they were the one spreading or causing the disease. Many Jews died too then that does not make sense that they were infecting their own communities and killing themselves.
Secondly, the statement that Jews were poisoning the wells since 1320 after the typhus breaks is completely false because the Christians came up with this claim long after the typhus break started. They thought the Jews were doomed and the Jews knew that that is the reason they poisoned the wells. But the typhus outbreak was in 1320 long before the Black Plague started. So, this reason claims that the Christians were totally wrong in their thinking. Since they believed they were the “masses”, they thought of the Jews as someone poor, unhealthy, and dangerous. They just tried to relate it somehow and blame it on the Jews.
The claims above I discussed are the fallacies at that time. I personally believe that since one was born Jew does not mean that he or she is bad. And what the “masses” believed at that time was completely wrong. The Jews did not cause the disease because the reasons I claimed above proves that. There must be other reasons that caused the disease and people did not think of the main cause at that time and blamed the minorities, the Jews.
Background Reading
In October 1347, Italian ships on the Black Sea en route to and from China dock in Messina, Sicily -- their crews are dead or dying. Whatever is killing them quickly spreads ashore. Within a month, it passes through Sicily and moves back out over water. By January 1348, it has penetrated France via Marseille and North Africa via Tunis, and by July 1348, it spreads through France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Eastern Hungary, and Southern England. This is all the more amazing given that at this time it took a person one to three months to travel from London to Rome. The plague died out in the winters and was resurrected in the springs. At the end of 1349, it had spread throughout the British Isles and Scandinavia and continued to move east.
The death toll was massive -- the "official" figure is one-third of Europe dead between 1348 and 1351, when it temporarily abated, but keep in mind that in some towns the death toll was 90 percent -- in others 10 percent. Further, the poor and anyone else living in close quarters (monks, for instance) died at a higher rate. Many monasteries were completely wiped out, but the death rates among the nobility and the nobility of the church were very low. Understandably, people wanted to know why this was happening to them. Here are the four prominent hypotheses of the day:
The claim of academics and physicians: The plague was the result of a triple conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars on March 20, 1345.
The Roman Catholic Church's claim: God's wrath -- it was a punishment for the people's sins.
The claim of the mayors and town-controlling nobles: Poor sanitation. Dumping waste in the streets leads to sickness (a revolutionary claim at the time -- no one actually knew this to be true).
The claim of the masses (i.e., everyone else): The Jews are poisoning the wells.
Here is the "evidence" used by each group, respectively, to support its claim:
Medicine at the time was based on astrology and astronomy. Most physical sickness was attributed to poor alignment of the stars. The conjunction had happened, and it was a rare celestial event. Other events had been tied to celestial causes. Many were waiting to see what the triple conjunction would cause, and when the Black Plague occurred, they felt that they had found out.
The Church said, "Look around." Plunder, looting, rape, prostitution, war, and drinking were everywhere. God's wrath had shown itself in destructive ways before -- the people of Noah's time were hit with a flood, and the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.
The sanitation workers were among the first to die, and other diseases were suspected to be related to poor sanitation.
Christians tortured "confessions" out of Jews. The Jews were believed to be "jealous" of the Christians (because, it was thought, the Jews knew "in their hearts" that they were damned). The lepers had been blamed for poisoning the wells and causing the typhus outbreak in 1320 (after the Black Plague, it was believed that the Jews set them up to it).
Here are some problems people at the time saw with the evidence:
Nobody but the academics and physicians believed their explanation!
If God's wrath already has descended, there's no reason to change one's behavior. The attitude was roughly, "If we're already doomed, why alter our behavior?"
Later sanitation workers appeared to be immune (unknown to the people, they'd been exposed and had developed a resistance). If it really was poor sanitation, why weren't they still dying? In fact, this immunity among sanitation workers caused many people to think the sanitation workers had magical powers. People followed them on their street-cleaning routes, trying to absorb some of the immunity. Others, more desperate, actually applied waste to themselves, thinking that it would keep the disease away.
So many Jews died too (Why would any community poison itself?). The other problem is that the plague was present in areas where no Jews lived.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree it was not at all right or fair to put some much blame on the Jewish people. I feel like the nobility had alot to do with the spreading of that rumor and people believed it was true and excepted it as truth because it was confirmed by them.
ReplyDelete