In October 1347, Italian ships on the Black Sea dock in Messina, Sicily -- their crews are dead or dying. Whatever is killing them quickly spreads ashore. Within a month, it passes through Sicily and moves back out over water. By January 1348, it has penetrated France via Marseille and North Africa via Tunis, and by July 1348, it spreads through France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Eastern Hungary, and Southern England. This is all the more amazing given that at this time it took a person one to three months to travel from London to Rome. The plague died out in the winters and was resurrected in the springs. At the end of 1349, it had spread throughout the British Isles and Scandinavia and continued to move east.
The death toll was massive -- the "official" figure is one-third of Europe dead between 1348 and 1351, when it temporarily abated, but keep in mind that in some towns the death toll was 90 percent -- in others 10 percent. Further, the poor and anyone else living in close quarters (monks, for instance) died at a higher rate. Many monasteries were completely wiped out, but the death rates among the nobility and the nobility of the church were very low. Understandably, people wanted to know why this was happening to them. Here are the four prominent hypotheses of the day:
The claim of academics and physicians: The plague was the result of a triple conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars on March 20, 1345.
The Roman Catholic Church's claim: God's wrath -- it was a punishment for the people's sins.
The claim of the mayors and town-controlling nobles: Poor sanitation. Dumping waste in the streets leads to sickness (a revolutionary claim at the time -- no one actually knew this to be true).
The claim of the masses (i.e., everyone else): The Jews are poisoning the wells.
Here is the "evidence" used by each group, respectively, to support its claim:
Medicine at the time was based on astrology and astronomy. Most physical sickness was attributed to poor alignment of the stars. The conjunction had happened, and it was a rare celestial event. Other events had been tied to celestial causes. Many were waiting to see what the triple conjunction would cause, and when the Black Plague occurred, they felt that they had found out.
The Church said, "Look around." Plunder, looting, rape, prostitution, war, and drinking were everywhere. God's wrath had shown itself in destructive ways before -- the people of Noah's time were hit with a flood, and the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.
The sanitation workers were among the first to die, and other diseases were suspected to be related to poor sanitation.
Christians tortured "confessions" out of Jews. The Jews were believed to be "jealous" of the Christians (because, it was thought, the Jews knew "in their hearts" that they were damned). The lepers had been blamed for poisoning the wells and causing the typhus outbreak in 1320 (after the Black Plague, it was believed that the Jews set them up to it).
Here are some problems people at the time saw with the evidence:
Nobody but the academics and physicians believed their explanation!
If God's wrath already has descended, there's no reason to change one's behavior. The attitude was roughly, "If we're already doomed, why alter our behavior?"
Later sanitation workers appeared to be immune (unknown to the people, they'd been exposed and had developed a resistance). If it really was poor sanitation, why weren't they still dying? In fact, this immunity among sanitation workers caused many people to think the sanitation workers had magical powers. People followed them on their street-cleaning routes, trying to absorb some of the immunity. Others, more desperate, actually applied waste to themselves, thinking that it would keep the disease away.
So many Jews died too (Why would any community poison itself?). The other problem is that the plague was present in areas where no Jews lived.
I believe so. I don't believe Jews are poisoning the well. Just like what you said, during that period, the transportation is not possible to support Jews traving around the Europe to poisons the wells, especially Jews is not that strong enough. They are more likely as a group of people who usually suffered and blamed by the other groups. They must be the most weak one during that time, so how possible for them to trave around and poisons the wells. Still, I will said this is an excuse for people to blame Jews.
ReplyDeleteBekoe, you make some good points in your argument. The one I want to discuss though is the one about the Jews confessing. I think you hit the nail right on the head. What is a person to do when they are being mercilessly tortured. If someone was ripping my finger nails off and burning me with acid I would confess to killing Abraham Lincoln. There isn't much you can do. The only thought running through someone's mind is "how do I get this to stop?" and that's through a false confession. To relate this to current events, I believe this topic is the cause of great controversy at Guantanamo Bay. Many people believe that the prisoners there are treated in such a way that they would confess to anything and are being wrongfully detained. It's funny how a 600 year old issue can still exist today. While the world has changed so much, it hasn't changed at all.
ReplyDeleteBekoe,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post. I totally agree with your points. There is only one thing that I would like to comment on. I've chosen the same topic as you did and while I was doing a research, I came across an interesting piece of information. I found a "testimony" that had a description of the composition of the poison. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, it was a poison "the ingredients of which were Christians' hearts, spiders, frogs, lizards, human flesh, and sacred hosts." Sounds pretty disgusting even nowadays, doesn't it? That's why I think it's not surprising that the question of the strength of the poison had never come across anyone's mind, especially in the 14th century.