In October 1347, Italian ships on the Black Sea dock in Messina, Sicily -- their crews are dead or dying. Whatever is killing them quickly spreads ashore. Within a month, it passes through Sicily and moves back out over water. By January 1348, it has penetrated France via Marseille and North Africa via Tunis, and by July 1348, it spreads through France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Eastern Hungary, and Southern England. This is all the more amazing given that at this time it took a person one to three months to travel from London to Rome. The plague died out in the winters and was resurrected in the springs. At the end of 1349, it had spread throughout the British Isles and Scandinavia and continued to move east.
The death toll was massive -- the "official" figure is one-third of Europe dead between 1348 and 1351, when it temporarily abated, but keep in mind that in some towns the death toll was 90 percent -- in others 10 percent. Further, the poor and anyone else living in close quarters (monks, for instance) died at a higher rate. Many monasteries were completely wiped out, but the death rates among the nobility and the nobility of the church were very low. Understandably, people wanted to know why this was happening to them. Here are the four prominent hypotheses of the day:
The claim of academics and physicians: The plague was the result of a triple conjunction of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars on March 20, 1345.
The Roman Catholic Church's claim: God's wrath -- it was a punishment for the people's sins.
The claim of the mayors and town-controlling nobles: Poor sanitation. Dumping waste in the streets leads to sickness (a revolutionary claim at the time -- no one actually knew this to be true).
The claim of the masses (i.e., everyone else): The Jews are poisoning the wells.
Here is the "evidence" used by each group, respectively, to support its claim:
Medicine at the time was based on astrology and astronomy. Most physical sickness was attributed to poor alignment of the stars. The conjunction had happened, and it was a rare celestial event. Other events had been tied to celestial causes. Many were waiting to see what the triple conjunction would cause, and when the Black Plague occurred, they felt that they had found out.
The Church said, "Look around." Plunder, looting, rape, prostitution, war, and drinking were everywhere. God's wrath had shown itself in destructive ways before -- the people of Noah's time were hit with a flood, and the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.
The sanitation workers were among the first to die, and other diseases were suspected to be related to poor sanitation.
Christians tortured "confessions" out of Jews. The Jews were believed to be "jealous" of the Christians (because, it was thought, the Jews knew "in their hearts" that they were damned). The lepers had been blamed for poisoning the wells and causing the typhus outbreak in 1320 (after the Black Plague, it was believed that the Jews set them up to it).
Here are some problems people at the time saw with the evidence:
Nobody but the academics and physicians believed their explanation!
If God's wrath already has descended, there's no reason to change one's behavior. The attitude was roughly, "If we're already doomed, why alter our behavior?"
Later sanitation workers appeared to be immune (unknown to the people, they'd been exposed and had developed a resistance). If it really was poor sanitation, why weren't they still dying? In fact, this immunity among sanitation workers caused many people to think the sanitation workers had magical powers. People followed them on their street-cleaning routes, trying to absorb some of the immunity. Others, more desperate, actually applied waste to themselves, thinking that it would keep the disease away.
So many Jews died too (Why would any community poison itself?). The other problem is that the plague was present in areas where no Jews lived.
I agree with this person since I believe that there is a straight contradiction in the claim that the those who dealt with wastes died first and then they suddenly developed some kind of magical powers that would immune them. Does that mean that they gained these powers altogether all of a sudden? I can hardly see where their argument is coming from.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in part that when you say that the town controlling nobility was frustrated and needed to blame others. What I don't totally agree with is you saying that there claim of sanitation workers getting immune to the poor sanitation been a contradiction. If you look at let say you start working in the hospital at first you will always get sick because your body is not used to been around people sneezing, coughing and other stuff. As you work for a longer period of time you start to see that all does thing don't effect you as much. Same with antibiotics the more you take a certain kind the less effect it does. So that why I think that at it makes sense that after sanitation workers where been killed at a larger rate because they where right there and once there body adopted they was been able to survive it. Our bodies always adopting.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree with you, I also think that the easiest way out when there is no clear explanation for things is just to say what first comes to our minds. It seems to me that us, humans, at the personal level and in the collective one, as societies, are scared to be fragile, to say “I don’t know”; that’s why there always has to be an explanation for everything, even if the explanation as solid as it should.
ReplyDeleteI agree with this post because sanitation cant not turn into a plague. This plague killed many people and went to a couple of cities. It was more than dirty people or an unclean society, it was undefined. The nobles had no explanation so they came up with this idea for the people to believe and not question. They assumed since they were "the noble" that their explanation was the truth.
ReplyDelete